The
Next Big Thing
March
30 2020
It
was always in the air.
And
somewhere
in
the cramped warrens
where
bureaucrats toil,
on
crumbling campuses
in
cluttered basement labs,
in
think tanks
novels
and
war games of apocalypse
plans
were being made.
All
gathering dust
instead
of acted on.
Not
when everyone was asking for money
for
everything else.
Not
when “now” rules
and
greed runs rampant
and
no one thinks past
the
next election date.
While
the doomsayers and Cassandras
and
hectoring catastrophists
kept
warning us
but
we refused to hear.
Overwhelmed
by
the day-to-day.
Reassured
by
the trappings of modernity.
And,
as always, the bugbear of inertia,
complicit
in believing
that
things have always been this way
and
will surely remain.
Perhaps,
in some hypothetical future;
but
not today
and
let tomorrow take care of itself.
But
how brilliant
looking
up at a lovely blue sky.
When
planes no longer fly.
When
the factories have gone dark
and
the air is sweet and clear.
When
the silence is almost eerie
to
unaccustomed ears,
straining
to hear
all
the sounds we missed.
When
life slows,
and
we begin to reassess
our
short and harried lives.
While
in the meantime
the
contagion spreads
politicians
deflect.
No
one saw it coming
I've
heard them say;
the
tipping points, unspoken threats,
exponential
spread
and
lack of preparedness.
All
the warnings and reports
we
blithely ignored,
disaster
plans
we
couldn't afford.
Who
knew?
Why
now?
Why
us?
And
then the next big thing,
because
there's always something, isn't there?
When
we will also hope for the best
offer
thoughts and prayers
blame,
regret
condolences.
When I sent this poem out
to my first readers, I prefaced it with these words:
I
rarely write political poems. And try not to write about current
events, since poems that are so grounded in the temporal have no
staying power. But I think this is a big enough thing that I'm
permitted to indulge. And the message is pretty universal: a version
of the grasshopper and ant, to distil it down to its most
rudimentary.
Trump
was also very much on my mind (here's where it gets political!):
his disbanding of the pandemic preparedness office; his cutting of
funds to the CDC; his grandstanding and bloviating; his deflection
and denial and desperate (not to mention continuing) efforts to
protect himself while casting blame. Can't get that @#$%#& out of
my head!!
My
nephew wrote back that he didn't see it as too political; or at least
not at all partisan. Perhaps it doesn't come through strongly in the
poem, but I was very much thinking politically. So here's how I
responded:
I
think this poem is political in the sense that it's a critique of
contemporary culture. But more than our political culture in general,
it's a critique of the right in particular. Because the flaws I'm
sneering at very much belong to the what passes these days for
conservatism. I say "passes" because this generation of
right wingers (particularly in the US) has no idea what authentic
conservatism is. All we get from them are tax breaks for the wealthy;
an attitude that regards poverty as a moral failing and all poor
people as undeserving; and such nonsensical theology as the
"prosperity gospel". It's all about greed and
self-enrichment. Not to mention an ignorance of science that at its
most odious has become climate change denial. The general values and
world view of this sort of person -- and they're the people in charge
right now -- is what I'm criticizing.
So
the political part is as much a condemnation of our culture as it is
of particular political actors. We live in a culture of instant
gratification, denial, greed, social climbing, solipsism,
self-importance. There is not enough humility, patience, deferred
gratification, or restrained consumption. So why weren't
we prepared, even though "we" know this was inevitable and
had plenty of resources to get ready? Because we're greedy; so don't
save for a rainy day, for future generations (same for climate
change), for our own future selves! Because we think short-term
and hunger for instant gratification. Because we're in denial, and
think we're either immune from calamity, or that God or some other
deus ex machina will descend from the heavens and save us. Being a
pessimist, a catastrophist, and someone who is partial to long-term
thinking and deferred gratification (and also a nihilist, which
means I have the personal humility of nihilism: not just the
meaninglessness of everything, but my own utter insignificance in
it!) , perhaps explains why I tend to see more than the bad luck of a
zoonotic virus.
And
it's not simply "bad luck", btw. Zoonotic viruses jumping
species is more a result of our intrusion on the natural world:
more an inevitability than simple misfortune. I'm thinking here of
overpopulation, forcing us ever outward into untouched nature, where
we come in contact with virus-laden bats; animal cruelty, as in those
"wet markets" of China; and superstition, in the form of
traditional Chinese medicine (in this particular case, the vast trade
in pangolins)).
I
guess this diatribe is a good example of why prose suits me
better than poetry. It's a relief to be able to say exactly
what I think. In poetry, it's all nuance and allusion, ambiguity and
misdirection; metaphor instead of definitive statement. Not to
mention that in prose I get to use all the words I want! ...But then,
that's the challenge of poetry: self-restraint, the discipline
of scarcity, the elegance of brevity.
No comments:
Post a Comment