Saturday, April 30, 2022

God's Children - April 30 2022

 

God's Children

April 30 2022


The players circle,

heads bowed

eyes shut

hands held.

Before the big game

they have gathered to pray,

even the sinners

and non-believers

and those of wavering faith.


Because this is teamwork.


Because this is how it's done.


Because we're human

and need to belong.

Especially the young,

teenage boys and girls

who, more than most

can't bear standing out.


And what harm can there be

in a few pious words

a reassuring ritual?

Even if God doesn't listen.

Or hears

but believes in free will.


The other team has gathered as well.

Everyone wishing

for no one to be injured

for help in doing their best.

But victory?

No one dare,

because greed is a sin,

and winning's unworthy of prayer,

and isn't it the meek

who shall, in the end, inherit?


I look at my feet

and hold my tongue.

An atheist

pretending to pray,

imagining

the deafening chorus

of human voices flooding the world,

rising up to heaven

every second, day-after-day

hoping to be heard.


God's children at play.

Linebackers

making tackles, talking trash,

fans

in face paint and team regalia

picking fights in the stands.


And after each huddle

a halfback scans the crowd

with tightly focused eyes.

The divorced dad

who never showed up

despite all his promises.


I was scanning the articles in the online Atlantic, and this one caught me eye: Let Coach Kennedy Pray. I didn't read it, but assume it has something to with prayer in schools, religious neutrality by the state, and the larger issue of freedom of vs freedom from religion. Didn't need to read, because those four words were more than enough to make me want to riff on the subject and see where it would go.

Once again, I will note that I am not writing autobiography. First of all, I wasn't good enough to play halfback! And second, my parents never divorced. (Didn't come watch me play, either. But then, I never expected that, so there was never any disappointment or disillusion.) . . .Although it's not totally made-up: the atheism is all me!

Schmoozing With the Muckity-Mucks - April 29 2022

 

Schmoozing With the Muckity-Mucks

April 29 2022


Politics

does not attract

the highest calibre candidate.

We let ourselves be ruled

by real estate agents

who have their faces painted

on bus stop benches,

divorce lawyers

who are tired of the law.

Because life has never been better

than when they were President

of their high school class.

And after all

we don't pay attention

to city hall

until the garbage goes uncollected,

the neighbour starts renting

to people who party all night.


The civil servants sigh

and answer the phone.

The technocrats

who actually know something

make the city run.

While the politicians

get their pictures taken

and schmooze with the muckity-mucks,

who will be good for business

after the voters turf them out.


Still, they are us,

flawed and vain

and a little larcenous,

but well-meaning at heart,

and good enough

to muddle through.


Who seem to need to be loved

more than the rest of us.

Our esteemed city fathers

and mother hens,

who really do enjoy

kissing babies

and pressing the flesh,

cutting ribbons

with over-sized scissors

as the they smile for the camera

and step up to the mic.


Why anyone would run for public office is beyond me. That sort of ambition and neediness self-selects for a certain type of person, one who isn't likely to be the most well-informed, best critical thinker, or of the highest ethical calibre. Or worse. In other words, pretty much any Republican politician in the party of Trump! Municipal politicians, though, are perhaps the most harmless. And certainly the best for me to zero in on without degenerating into an impassioned rant of incredulity at the Margaret Taylor Greenes and Mat Gaetzes. (As I just did! Also, I try to make my poems evergreen, and one fervently hopes that 10 years from now no one will even recognize those names.) And as they say, all politics is local.

I realize that there are civic-minded and idealistic politicians. Even ones that are good at what they do, and have sacrificed lucrative careers for public service. Nevertheless, by and large the political class is mediocre. And, because of this odd self-selection – among other impediments to public office for many people – not really representative.

I think city fathers is clearly sexist. My apologies if the corrective — mother hens — strikes you as even more so! In my defence, there is no good equivalent, and I really wanted stick with that slightly anachronistic and endearingly patriarchal term instead of finding something neutrally non-gendered. Because for me city fathers invokes an image of a well-fed, self-satisfied, and somewhat self-important local politician. Meanwhile, mother hens works so nicely in terms of rhythm and rhyme.

The title is cribbed from one of my favourite lines. I really don't like stealing my own thunder that way; but in this case, couldn't resist!


Higher Learning - April 28 2022

 

Higher Learning

April 28 2022


The common term

at a place of higher learning

is “get an education”.


As if it's a neatly packaged object.

to be administered, traded, bought.

Like ground pork

stuffed into its tight skin casing

and slipped down your throat,

holus bolus

at too young an age

to be sure just what you ate.


It comes

with a certificate of authenticity,

like a specially raised pig

from an exclusive terroir

with its own appellation of origin.

A credential that's good for life;

no need

to go on learning,

and with little concern

how much or soon you'll forget.


But I wonder about that wise old man

who taught himself everything,

and is still

curious as a three year old

hungry as a teenage boy.

Even though he's trying to be vegan,

not the omnivore

he used to be

before he knew about such things.


He wouldn't call himself an educated man,

with its implication

of the past tense.

There is too much to know

and think about,

and he's aware just how vast

his ignorance is.


He doesn’t speak much

quietly observes.

Has learned

that experience helps

and failure teaches.

Knows

that it works its way

from information

to knowledge

to wisdom.

And that humility is key,

because he's been wrong

more times than he'd care to admit.


He has no degree

and earns a good enough living

driving a bus.


But I've noticed the books

stacked under his seat,

the hand-written journal

that sits in his lap.


The faraway look in his eyes

when the idling bus

is stuck in rush hour traffic.


How, on rainy days

passengers

who are short of cash

get seated anyway.


And how long

he waits at the stop

for the pregnant lady

he sees frantically waving 

in the rear view mirror,

who is running late

and breathing fast

and trying hard to catch up.


This week's Freakonomics podcast was about higher education. Especially the elite schools, which admit few, charge a lot, and depend on scarcity and exclusivity to enhance the value of their degrees. The expression get an education came up a few times, and I've always found this an unfortunate one. But one which also says a lot about instrumental learning vs curiosity-driven learning, credentialism vs education, and compartmentalized learning vs lifelong. I thought the best way to illuminate these contrasts was the autodidact, who is self-taught and doesn't stop just because he's graduated. And just as the prestige of his credential doesn't matter to him, neither does the status of his job. Because what a man does and doesn't do count for so much more than the conventional markers of educational attainment, or social and career success.

I think a bus driver came so immediately to mind – really, I could have picked any blue collar job – because I had just read this beautifully written piece, the First Person feature in today's Globe and Mail.


A LIFE IN TRANSIT

The Globe and Mail (Ontario Edition)

28 Apr 2022

Jessica Magonet lives in Vancouver.

ILLUSTRATION BY MARY KIRKPATRICK

I used to treasure my bus commute, where I was not my name or salary or job title, just a blurred face in the window, Jessica Magonet writes.

The bus is a liminal place. A kind of in-between or nowhere. Sometimes the bus is quiet and sometimes it is not. Sometimes children or adults cry on the bus. I’ve cried on the bus before. I like that you don’t have to do anything on the bus. There are so few places left in the world where you don’t have to do anything any more. Of course, you can do lots of things on the bus. You can knit or paint your nails or read a book or scream. You can make a friend or call your mum or write a poem or pray. You can even answer work e-mails on the bus if you really want to and you have data on your cellphone plan. I do not.

You can gaze out the window and watch the city unfold before you, the subtle shifts between neighbourhoods, you can watch townhouses and cafés give way to condos and skyscrapers, ocean and clouds.

Or you look around inside the bus and study your travelling companions, their outfits, their habits. The bus creates a temporary community for people whose paths might not otherwise cross.

The city buses have taken me home so many times. They have sheltered me from rain. I used to dread rainy mornings on the No. 19: so many people crammed together, the unbidden intimacy with unknown shoulders and purses, necks and hair. But during the early months of the pandemic, when I mostly stayed home, I daydreamed about this crowded bus, this place where I was overwhelmed by touch. It seemed otherworldly.

I like being a passenger, in motion, in transit. I like being fleeting. On the bus, I am not my name or salary or job title. I’m just a blurred face in the window.

I love reading on the bus, getting so lost in a book that I miss my stop. I love writing long letters, too.

When I moved to Vancouver in 2018, I spent a lot of time on the bus, travelling from my home in Mount Pleasant to my job downtown. I treasured that commute. It was a part of the day that belonged entirely to me. My work was stressful, but on the bus, I didn’t owe anything to anyone. I could be anonymous, invisible. I was so lonely when I moved here, but the people on the bus kept me company.

Often, I would curl up in one of the bus’s plastic chairs and write long letters to my friends in Montreal. Often, I would read. Riding the bus gave me permission to indulge in these luxuries.

In Vancouver, people don’t often talk to strangers. It is a difficult place to make friends. But reading on the bus sparked conversations.

A woman interrupted me while I was reading Bad Endings by Carleigh Baker on the No. 8 to tell me how much she loved it. I spoke to a man reading In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts by Dr. Gabor Mate on the No. 19 and he shared his experience working at a legalized drug injection site with me. Books on the bus were portals to connection.

I remember one February evening, shortly after I moved to Vancouver, waiting for the bus in the rain. It was cold and dark and I was crying. I had just attended my first appointment with a new therapist and it had been a disaster.

The bus pulled up and I stepped inside. A passenger in the first row was reading a book of poetry. This Wound is a World by Billy-Ray Belcourt. “I loved that book!” I told her. She offered me the seat beside her. “Are you a poet?” she asked. “Yes,” I replied shyly. “And you?” She nodded. We exchanged names and contact information.

It was then that I realized I was on the wrong bus. I bid my new friend, author Elena Johnson, goodbye and hopped off.

Later that week, I checked out Elena’s book from the library. I fell in love with Field Notes for the Alpine Tundra, with Elena’s sparse and quiet poems. And I was amazed by the kismet of our encounter. Elena wrote her book while she was the writer-in-residence at a remote research station in the Yukon. I had participated in an artist residency on the Yukon River the previous summer.

When I told my dad about befriending Elena, he said: “That’s a wonderful story. But you weren’t on the wrong bus.”

I love making new friends on the bus. But I also love finding familiar faces in the crowd of passengers. I love encountering my partner on the bus unexpectedly, their features coming into focus, the moment of recognition when our eyes light up. I love sitting down beside them and taking their hand.

I used to know Vancouver’s transit routes by heart. But after months of pandemic restrictions and working remotely, this knowledge has left me. Now, I have to Google the route before leaving home. This feels like losing a map or a language I once spoke. In the context of the past two years, this loss is a small one. But it still deserves its place in the catalogue of losses.

In February, I finished reading The Book of Form and Emptiness by Ruth Ozeki while riding the 99-B line. “I’m intrigued,” the bus driver said, motioning toward the cover. “What’s it about?” I closed the book and considered. “Zen Buddhism, books, hoarding, hearing voices, jazz … oh, and a bunch of it takes place at a library inspired by Vancouver’s Central Branch!” “Jazz, eh?” he replied. “I love jazz.”

Through the window beside my desk, I hear the whistle of the Skytrain circling the city. This sound winds its way through birdsong, wraps itself around my home. I think of all the buses making their way through busy streets, leaving no trace of their paths. The crowds of faceless people stepping through their open doors.


Sleeping Rough - April 27 2022

 

Sleeping Rough

April 27 2022


A restless night

for the man under the bridge

in a small orange tent

that's seen better days.


Passersby

strolling through the park

judge him.

Little kids are curious,

but their parents shoo them away.

The police

who have more urgent things to do

may or may not

train powerful flashlights through the mesh

and make him move.


He curls up against

his mongrel dog

sharing body heat.

A water basin freezes.

The cold penetrates,

up from frozen earth

and through the frigid air.


Homeless friends

spend winter nights in shelters,

but there are fights

and people steal

and smelly men snore.

So he'd rather be free

than warm.


The young man

who never thought he'd come to this

would be horrified.

The ex-wife

would nod knowingly.

The children

who don't even know he's alive

have busy lives

somewhere else.


But the steadfast dog

is going nowhere.

Certainly not the shelter,

which does not welcome pets

no matter what.


The bridge

doesn't keep the snow off.

It blows in from the sides,

water, mixed with salt

drips from the overpass.


Nowadays

the correct term isn't “homeless”

it's “unhoused”.

Because words have meaning,

and this is not who he is

but how.

And anyway, he has a home,

as cramped and cold as it is.


I was scanning headlines, and some words caught my eye — “What Da Homeless Man . . . “ — and for some reason this poem this poem immediately began to form in my head. Somehow, in the writing, it became another dog poem. Which I'm grateful for: a nice diversion from the rather earnest social commentary that otherwise runs through it.

I'm often suspicious of euphemistic coinages like unhoused. But in this case, I applaud the new word. It's objectively true. It's free, at least for now, of the baggage and implied judgment contained in homeless. And it carries within it a simple solution, as “housing first” experiments have demonstrated.

I think the implication of the ending is also that wherever his dog is becomes home. Home is not about place; it's about relationship.

I'm particularly pleased with the 5th stanza. I like the way it implies a whole back story, but leaves it to the reader to fill in the blanks. And it also humanizes him. Because we identify with the young man's certainty: this happens to other people; surely, like him, we would never come to this.


Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Change of Heart - April 26 2022

 

Change of Heart

April 26 2022


The cruellest thing

was not that they were shot

in the back of the head

with their hands tied.

Or buried

beneath a couple feet of earth,

shallow enough

to be scavenged by wild animals.

Or even the words

of scorn and derision

that were the last things they heard.


It was digging their own graves,

all the while

hoping faintly

for rescue

intervention

a diametric change of heart.


How foolish, we think

looking back

and knowing what took place.


As if hope can ever be false.


As if we, too, would not find inconceivable

our own imminent death.


As if in our civilized world

genocide

was no longer possible,

that humanity had progressed

from the primitive state

of the 20th century

to this enlightened 21st.


The skunks were first

clawing at loose stony earth.

Emaciated foxes

gorged ravenously.

Vultures circled, and squabbled,

tearing at what remained.


A fresh snow fell,

and the killing field

was concealed in virgin white.

Which only lasted a while;

the heat

of decomposing bodies

turning it to mud.


I normally try not to express my despair, anger, and cynicism so openly in my poems. But after reading a few pieces by Anne Applebaum about Russia's war against Ukraine, and then a reference in a friend's correspondence about (I paraphrase) “digging their own graves, even if just for a few more minutes of life”, the floodgates opened.

In writing this I thought about the Nazis – before they came up with mass execution by poison gas – trying not to waste bullets by lining people up and killing two with one shot. It is so ironic -- if that isn't too mild a word – that Putin has chosen “Nazi” as his preferred way to dehumanize and demonize the Ukrainian people. Dictators seem blind to such ironies: that their ginned-up accusations of misbehaviour so perfectly reflect their own crimes. It's as if they can only see the world through their own limited prism of disordered human behaviour.

Seat-Mates - April 25 2022

 

Seat-Mates

April 25 2022


The shared armrest

sits like a hyphen between us,

separating

but also signifying

that we are somehow linked.


How, in silence

and careful not to touch

we come to an understanding

about proper boundaries

and elbow space.


And how, in Row 3, seats A and B

we find ourselves tethered

no matter what.

Breathing in the same air.

Waiting as long for drinks,

as the harried attendant

negotiates the narrow aisle.

Looking wide-eyed

at each other,

as the plane drops violently

and our stomachs somersault.


Because hyphens

both join and divide.

They appear to have no rules.

Some use them liberally,

meticulous

about compartmentalizing terms,

while others prefer the streamlined look

of compound words.


And then the young couple

who have flipped that metal divider

up out of the way,

and are snuggling together

in the love-seat they've made

out of Row 11

window and centre.

Unselfconsciously touching

they have become a compound word,

not quite sure

where one begins

and the other ends.


Watching their embrace

curved in each other's arms

I think of semi-colons

and opening brackets.

A question mark

about how their romance began.

An ellipsis

for after we land,

and they glide hand-in-hand

down the crowded aisle

like a holiday island of two

off to who knows where.


While the rest of us shuffle off

with a perfunctory nod

at the temporary seat-mates

whose names we still don't know.

Who, in a moment of inattention

we brushed elbows with,

instantly retracting

while staring straight ahead.



A piece by Mary Norris – the New Yorker's resident grammar nerd – inspired this poem. I sent her the first draft, and she was gracious enough to read and respond. I thought readers might find our brief correspondence of interest. Here it is, so far.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just read your piece “How to Use (or Not Use) A Hyphen” on the New Yorker app. I know it's a little indirect, but this is the only way I found to get in touch with you. I'd like to share this poem, inspired (at least partially!) by your piece. It's the first draft, so may have some rough spots. The final version will eventually appear on my blog at brianspoetryjournal.blogspot.ca, if you ever care to visit. Thanks for reading.

Brian

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bravo! I am delighted to think that my hyphen piece inspired, at least in part, a poem. They hyphen as armrest. I like it!

I took a look at your blog, too, and applaud you for finding something to do with your poetry. Good luck with it and all the est to you. Thanks!

Yours,

Mary

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

. . . and applaud you for finding something to do with your poetry . . . .“ Yes, there really isn't much to do with poetry, is there?

Unless, that is, it's in the form of popular music. Unfortunately, lyrics are rarely poetry (my apologies to Leonard Cohen, one of the few exceptions), and while hip-hop is close enough, an old fart like me has no taste for it. Actually, the blog began as just the frugal man's cheap cloud storage device: a back-up for my stuff, in case my computer melted down (again!) And since it's rarely looked at by anyone, it's still basically that.

I wonder if everyone writing you feels the same edge of anxiety as I do (and did): do they also picture your narrowed eyes and the pinched sour look on your face as you encounter each glaring grammatical misstep? Luckily, in poetry, all rules are off!

Anyway, I'm glad you didn't take issue with the implication in my poem that a hyphen is a punctuation mark (along with brackets, ellipsis, and semicolons (which, btw, I repeatedly spell semi-colon, and which keeps eliciting a squiggly red underline by the eagle-eyed grammarians at g-mail)), which your piece declares it is not (since it's included within a word). Who knew?!!

Here is the revised version. Hope you like it at least as much. It's nice to be one's own editor. Way back when, I had a letter published in the New Yorker, and I was not at all pleased with the very rigorous and ruthless editing process. I felt they eviscerated my letter of all its elegance and colour. But then again, don't most authors think every one of their precious words is sacrosanct and inviolable?

Thank you for reading. I was delighted to receive your reply.

Brian

Sunday, April 24, 2022

Best Laid Plans - April 24 2022

 

Best Laid Plans

April 24 2022


When the best laid plans

collide with circumstance

life gets interesting.


If only the fortune tellers

and tea leaves

and readers of entrails

had something worthwhile to say.


If only the loud talking heads

shouting through the screen

knew what they were talking about.


If only history

came around again,

and we could look ahead

by looking back.


I believe in being prepared,

but time after time, get blind-sided

by contingency

surprise

complication.


And in the end

like everyone else

surrender to fate.

Because there is no self-made man,

no boot-straps long enough.

No visualization

that makes it so,

prognostication

you can count on.

No bloviating loud-mouth

spewing spittle

from a red flushed face

with anything useful to say.


Throw some dice

pick a card

pull the slot.

And when at last

the cherries align

and the klaxon sounds

and the coins come spilling out,

collect your winnings

and know it's time to stop.


All worthwhile just to get to say “bloviating”: a delightful but rather archaic word that not too long ago got a second life. In an age of populist demagogues and loud-mouth ideologues, a word that's perfect for our time.

You Can See It From Space - April 23 2022

 

You Can See It From Space

April 23 2022


You can see it from space

is what they say

about The Great Wall.

The vast tapestry

of cultivated land

and deforestation

in shades of green and brown.

The show of lights

covering the planet

like a diamond encrusted bauble;

brightly lit cities

connected

by intricate skeins of light,

and the few dark patches

we have yet to occupy.


The lightning

flashing over the surface

in a non-stop display

I would never have expected.

That makes this blue and green planet

we call home

seem alien,

as if the earth was alive

and electrified

and hostile to life.


But so much that goes unseen;

too small, or immaterial

to notice.

The microscopic creatures.

Underground, or out at sea.

The inner lives

of you and me;

the suffering

and ecstasy

and stoical endurance.


And looking down

from low earth orbit,

the alarmingly thin sliver of air

that protects us from space.

Invisible, to us

beneath its warm sustaining cover.


And looking the other way

what can only be seen

by astronauts looking up.

The black void

of outer space

with its infinite succession of stars;

hard pinpoints of light

that keep on appearing

the longer you look.

That even during daylight

can all be seen,

a stunning halo of glitter

surrounding the sun

like a richly jewelled crown.


I encountered that expression, used in the clever but rather cliched way we often refer to something that's tastelessly large, or overvalued. But an expression that is also used literally, usually in relation to man-made objects: sometimes impressed, and sometimes with alarm. This poem can be seen both ways, depending on how you view our presence here. Are we colonizers and despoilers? Or are we brilliant builders with the power to alter a planet?

As the idea for this was forming, I thought I saw some lightning, which immediately brought to mind that surprising image as seen from the space station. Not man's work, but the power of nature. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gyUKAXRMj0)

The poem concludes by also looking the other way. This is something I hadn't been aware of until recently: how, when there is no atmosphere to distort the view, you can see every star splashed across the black background of outer space, even when the sun is fully visible. The atmosphere is the only reason we don't see stars during the day, alongside a fully illuminated sun.

Because the poem is mostly descriptive, with no real narrative cohesion,I was hoping that the call-back that ends the poem would help cinch it tight: the richly jewelled crown echoing the diamond encrusted bauble.