A
Thousand Yard Stare
June 22 2026
The
lower branches
overshadowed
by taller trees
were
brittle as twigs
and
dotted with blighted buds;
hard
little nubs
that
never opened.
A
tree — sensible, if not sentient —
culls
its weakest link
as
it keeps reaching for the light.
Like
cutting off the arm
you
don’t write with,
starving
the part of your brain
receptive
to love
when
you finally give up on it.
Hard
to hug
with
just one arm.
Oddly,
the top was also dead.
A
porcupine had girded the tree
of
a section of bark,
throttling
its
upper end
like
a hand around the neck.
So
just the middle still lived;
but
to my eye
barely.
We
cut it down
then
bucked and split the wood
and
stacked it for winter;
making
the best
of
a regrettable loss.
I’d
say put it out of its misery,
but
then
we’re
told trees do not feel;
that
they’re not sentient
but
simply are.
The
life force
and
its surprising toughness.
How a
tree
reduced
to a remnant
still
strains for the sun,
and
how a man
fights
to the last breath;
even
on the verge
of
certain death.
Or
does he?
Because
I’ve see that people do let go . . .
eventually.
Few
rage until the end
die
gracelessly.
The
life force, as fierce as it is
resigns
itself,
accepts,
goes
peacefully enough.
A
mercy indeed,
like
a chainsaw to the heartwood
in
a shower of chips
and
matter of seconds.
Or
like the antelope going limp
in
the jaws of a leopard,
its
eyes
glazed
and fixed
in
a thousand yard stare.
I
can only hope
its
violent death
is
as painless as it looks.
This began with a real
incident. One of my precious tamaracks. As
always, where it went after that was completely unplanned.
I
wonder if there is flood of endorphins at the moment struggle becomes
futile. When I see prey being killed on nature docs, it always
appears that way. But then wonder how evolution — operating
through the twin imperatives of reproduction and survival — could
possibly select for this mercy. Because a killed animal doesn’t
reproduce, so can’t pass anything on to its descendants. And
because when death is inevitable, nothing benefits its survival.
Instead
of The life force / and its surprising toughness, I
wanted to write in plain English It’s hard to kill a man.
Because it is. But thought such a statement might sound more like a
confession: as if I’ve actually tried it! . . . Anyway, the
way the poem turned out, it didn’t really fit.
They
say the electrical signals we’re able to detect in trees change
predictably when they’re harmed or attacked. That they release
pheromones, perhaps even inaudible (to us) sounds. None, of course,
is evidence of subjective distress; that is, of feeling pain and
emotional suffering. But they are suggestive, nevertheless. But is it
even possible for us to contemplate consciousness in an organism so
different that it lacks both a brain and a nervous system?
Coincidentally,
I read this just a few hours ago:
Quebec town
recognizes the rights of trees
The
Globe and Mail (Ontario Edition)
22
Jun 2026
MORGAN
LOWRIE
GRAHAM
HUGHES/THE CANADIAN PRESS
A
small town west of Montreal has decided to officially recognize trees
as living beings with rights of their own, in what an environmental
organization describes as a first in Quebec and Canada.
A
resolution adopted by Terrasse-Vaudreuil city council on June 9
declares that trees are worthy of protection, “including the right
to life, to natural growth, to integrity and to regeneration.”
Mayor
Michel Bourdeau says Quebec filmmaker André Desrochers inspired the
community to take action.
He
said Mr. Desrochers’s film, called Des arbes et des arts convinced
citizens that trees are living entities that live, breathe and
communicate with each other through their root systems.
“A
tree is like a human being,” Mr. Bourdeau said. “It breathes, it
lives, it takes in water. It protects us from all sorts of things.”
The
International Observatory of Nature Rights says the town of about
2,000 also became the first municipality in Quebec and Canada to sign
on to the Universal Declaration of the Rights of the Tree, which is
an international initiative spearheaded by environment groups.
Its
three main core articles state that trees are living beings and a
common human good, that life on Earth depends on their existence, and
that humans must act in “fraternity and solidarity” with them.
Mr.
Bourdeau says the new resolution means the town will review its
existing rules and bylaws to ensure that trees are protected or
replaced, if they must be cut down. He also plans to implement
measures to further increase the canopy, including offering trees for
residents to plant.
“Trees
are a true green infrastructure,” he said. “They help reduce
urban heat islands, improve air quality, manage precious water
resources and protect biodiversity.”
Mr.
Bourdeau said the move was adopted unanimously by councillors, and
appears popular with citizens as well. He also doesn’t anticipate
it causing any problems, such as interfering with development,
although that’s partly because the town has no more vacant land on
which to build.
He
says his town is a natural fit to become a tree ambassador. It’s
built in the woods, and its citizens value a rural lifestyle. Its
residents are also intimately aware of the damage caused by extreme
weather and climate change, after being flooded three times in recent
years.
When
it comes to fighting climate change, “our biggest ally is the
trees,” he said.
Yenny
Vega Cardenas, the president of the International Observatory of
Nature Rights, says the declaration on tree rights is part of the
same push that has seen jurisdictions around the world, from New
Zealand to Colombia, grant legal personhood to rivers and other
natural areas.
It
has also happened in Canada, where Quebec’s Magpie river was
granted legal rights by a regional government and the Innu Council of
Ekuanitshit in 2021.
But
Ms. Vega Cardenas says the tree declaration is special because it
acknowledges that a single tree is an ecosystem of its own, which can
provide shade, food and habitat for other species.
“We
need to understand that [trees] have dignity and they have senses,”
she said. “Not sentiments, but senses … They can feel and they
communicate with each other in a very specific way.”
Karine
Péloffy, a lawyer with Ecojustice, described Terrasse-Vaudreuil’s
decision as a “very hopeful gesture in the broader movement for the
rights of nature,” and said the idea isn’t as strange as it might
initially seem.
“We
know corporations have legal personhood and rights and they are
definitely not living,” she said in a phone interview. “So if
some nonliving things can have legal personhood, what’s stopping
living beings from equally getting legal personhood?”