The Sound of Gunshots At
Dusk
Could it be kids, taking pot-shots
at cans on fence-posts
empty bottles?
A man, instructing his son
in the finer points of gunmanship?
Or an old clunker, billowing blue-black smoke
back-firing down
some country lane?
Hunting season, again.
When men
heft freshly-oiled guns,
true their aim
down long steel barrels;
eyes narrowed,
cool metal, brushing the cheek.
cool metal, brushing the cheek.
When men
sport camouflage, and brilliant orange vests.
When a walk in the woods
can be deadly.
But I could never kill a deer.
My trigger-finger would freeze
squinting down the cross-hairs
at a buck in heat;
head held high, snorting steam,
magnificent rack
battle-tested.
Too beautiful to waste.
Too miraculous
to be so lightly taken.
I'd rather see him run,
muscles taut
legs a blur.
Or stand, in a clearing in the woods
skittish as a coiled spring,
fierce brown eyes
flashing light.
The calculated act
of squeezing-off a shot
seems cowardly, unredeemable;
scoring my kill
out of sight and smell
like some act of God.
Perhaps, if I were a more manly man
I would hunt, as well.
But I'd rather capture the beast
in words,
walk lightly through the bush
and observe.
The fellow feeling
of one lowly creature
for another,
equally deserving of life.
Or even fire-crackers? No,
definitely rifles. And since I think it's too early for hunting season, most
likely target practice. I've been hearing gunfire in the distance for several
weeks. Usually in the late evening. A hunter, just itching to get going again?
Kids, taking pot-shots? So even though it's still August (although it feels
like fall, so far this year!), my thoughts turn to hunting, and how unpleasant
I find it. Especially with all the recent controversy about trophy hunting,
big-game safaris, and the targeting of endangered animals.
I know, I know; I'm being
hypocritical. After all, I eat meat, wear leather shoes. The only feeble
distinction I can raise in my defence is that livestock are raised for the
purpose: they wouldn't otherwise have been born. And that their lives are so
uninspired and bovine, they somehow seem less worthy, compared to a wild
animal. As I said, pretty feeble! So perhaps it's more my repugnance at killing
for sport. For subsistence, yes, In self-defence, yes. But not for fun. And to
call this "sport" -- when killing is nothing such, and when guns make
it anything but fair -- seems hardly sporting. Which is why manly man is
most definitely said ironically.
Still, even if I was going to be
ruthlessly reductive about taking life, I know I would not be able to pull the
trigger if I had a magnificent deer in my sights. I'd have to kill him with my
bare hands for it not to seem cowardly. And a wild animal is so essentially
alive -- so full of grace and beauty and complexity -- that tossing off a shot
is too easy, too disrespectful, too horrible an act of wanton destruction. The
suffering of an animal always seems to cut me to the quick. The thought of
inflicting that suffering is unbearable.
I use act of God. But of
course, as a committed atheist, I never use the word "God" literally.
It's more of a short-hand for the presumption and privilege with which we often
view nature; or, to be Biblical again, the idea of "dominion" more as
dominance than stewardship and custody. Which is why I end the poem with a
statement of humility -- lowly creature -- as well as empathy -- equally
deserving of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment