From Here
My grandmother was born here
before the turn of the last century.
She was still a child, when they left
not long after;
a mere asterix, in her biography,
when this town was small
and even more remote.
I didn't know her well.
We lived a long way off,
and she was not a big hugger, baker, comforter,
the grandmotherly sort
you tend to think of.
It's shocking to imagine
that touching hands with her
is like reaching across the 20th century,
all that tumult and change
when the world was re-made
so many times over.
And that, through circumstance and choice
I ended up living here as well.
Which means I can claim the history
of 3 generations,
our ancestral name
planted like a flag
in its hard perpetual granite.
When I am really rootless, and unattached,
living without the enmeshed entangled
connectedness
of real family.
So how long, before you're from here?
What makes belonging, identity
a sense of place?
Is it real estate?
Is it friends, marriage, blood?
Is it acceptance
from the wary old-timers
who count generations like currency,
and to whom come-from-aways
are born poor
and will die in debt?
Home, which you can only make
the best of.
When I moved here -- to Thunder
Bay -- I don't think I even realized that my paternal
grandmother spent her early childhood here. (The actual birth was in
North Dakota, where her own mother's (father's?) extended family had originally
homesteaded, and where her pregnant mother returned to give birth; but that's a
mere technicality. And I took some poetic license with the "ancestral
name", which -- because it follows the maternal line -- was Lyone, not
Green.) They eventually moved on to the big city of Winnipeg
-- in those days, the ambitious "Chicago
of the north" -- and all connections with Ft.
William were severed. (Ft.
William , along with Port
Arthur , are the twin cities that amalgamated in the
1970s to make present day Thunder Bay .
Alright, another technicality: I'm a Port Arthur
guy, and her family actually lived in Ft.
William . Since the psychological
division still exists between the traditional rivals, I feel compelled to
specify my allegiance!)
So I have this paradoxical relationship to this place: deep
roots; and also rootless. It makes me think of small towns and insular islands,
especially when their population inevitably ages: how you have to go back at
least 3 generations to even be considered a native. Live in the place all you
adult life, and you're still a newcomer and come-from-away.
So this poem becomes an opportunity to explore ideas of
place and attachment, of belonging and home. (And I think there is a simple
answer to the tortured question of the poem: home is where you have kids. They
root you. Of course, since I'm childless, the question for me remains open.)
I also think the 3rd stanza carries a lot of weight, even
though it's a bit of a digression. Because to have a first person connection to
the late 19th century while standing here in the early 21st is really quite
remarkable. I can't think of a more portentous or revolutionary century than
the 20th (in which I was born pretty much in the middle), of a century that has
changed history more. Especially considering that in the centuries before the
Enlightenment, and then the Industrial Revolution, things almost never
changed (just as most people, in an entire lifetime, never went more than 20
miles from home)! I look at images of the skyline of Toronto ,
illuminated at night, and think how utterly gobsmacked and incomprehensible
this futuristic mirage would be for someone instantly transported from 1890.
Which, in the perspective of history, is really just a blink of the eye.
No comments:
Post a Comment