Wednesday, April 5, 2017


The Secret Life of Trees
April 4 2017


They hide in plain sight,
the secret life of trees
in their forest cathedral.

There's a path through the woods
where it straightens out
and trees line either side.
Smooth trunks, evenly spaced
rising-up like sentinels,
a canopy
of dappled green
in a gently curving arch.
Like the nave
of a great medieval church
I feel sanctuary under its vault;
the filtered light
the cool air
the lofty open space.

But the mystery of trees
is their underground existence.

Roots, dividing finer and finer
until they intertwine,
an elaborate web
passing molecules, messages.
Branching mycelia
who feed, and are fed,
microscopic saprophytes
resurrecting the dead.

And chemical signals
from porous leaves
resounding through the air;
the cacophony of trees
in the wood's majestic stillness.

I listen to a hard rain
on an aspen in spring,
its tight succulent buds
beginning to unfurl.
On a sprawling maple's
autumn foliage,
its brittle parchment's flattened note.
And a cedar's dark green fronds
absorbing, softening.

Like bird song
I learn the woods by ear;
each, a distinct sound
in a community of trees,
a congregation
singing from its hymn book.

Stopped
in the cool shade
of its high green canopy
we are small,
tiny inhabitants
of a larger body
too vast to comprehend.
We thought there were trees
when forest
was all there was;
a single organism
we never heard, and never saw
walking through its heart.




Scroll down to the bottom, and you'll find a link to the article that inspired this poem.

Ed Yong is a staff writer at the Atlantic, and almost every day produces a terrific piece of scientific journalism. The article is his review of a book by David George Haskell, The Song of Trees.

Yong describes Haskell as “a kind of naturalist-poet”, and I find this greatly appealing. My poetry is very much about close observation and microcosm; and from the sensibility and prose style this review suggests, I think Haskell and I think very much alike, are trying to see the world in much the same way.

The things that please me most about this poem are getting the religious metaphor just right, without laying it on too thick; and managing to shoe-horn in a couple of complicated technical words -- mycelia and saprophytes -- without jarring the flow. I really dislike taking poetic license with the science. 

I think the religious metaphor can be seen into the final stanza, even though there are no explicit references there. Because the idea of being in something bigger than ourselves but that we're unable to discern could be taken as a religious allegory as well: that is, our smallness and solipsism, set against the ineffable mystery of God  ...creation  ...the universe. 

By the way, there really is a spot like this. On one of the trails near my home on Hazelwood Lake. Harder to tell in winter. But once it's leafed out, this tunnel of green is quite outstanding. My first time there, the word "sanctuary" came to mind, as it does repeatedly each time I visit.

Anyway, here it is. I'm counting on the Internet's reputed capacity and permanence (as if!) to keep this link live.



No comments: