Restraint
Oct
1 2019
The
beauty of music
is
in the the space between the notes.
The
cleansing pause
where
the sound is allowed to resonate
then
fade gently away.
That
moment of rest
when
our every sense
is
alert to what comes next.
The
great vocalists
keep
us waiting as well;
restraining
themselves
as
if toying with us,
longing
to hear them give
full
voice.
Their
pent-up power held,
until
the cathartic release
when
they finally do let go.
I
do not play
and
cannot carry a note.
But
I listen, and appreciate.
So,
is this what makes us human?
Is
it music
rather
than fire, thumbs, or tools?
Not
the cultures we inhabit
or
the ability to learn,
moral
reasoning
or
the rational discourse of words?
Because
we are not thinking creatures who feel
but
feeling creatures who think.
And
because
while
we process words
a
song enters directly into the brain
without
mediation.
It
touches our minds
fires
our blood
irradiates
down to the bone,
lighting
us up
with
a green shimmering glow.
Where its signal remains,
energized
atoms
in
a chain reaction
lifting
us out of ourselves.
It's
odd how this poem came about, because the one I intended to write
never got written.
I
was looking at some close-up photography, and one image was of a
Praying Mantis.
I
was struck by the elegance of this highly specialized insect.
I
was struck by the fine detail of the natural world that we miss, even
though we are surrounded by it, confined as we are to the limited
order of magnitude we inhabit. It is only thanks to modern technology
– the magnifying glass and microscope; lenses, telescopes, and
cameras – that we have even been able to discover other worlds, to
access orders of magnitude such as this one: all the multiple
universes that exist parallel to ours, but hide in plain sight.
I
thought of how we evaluate beauty: that is, as an aesthetic
experience of something in isolation. And then how the real
beauty of nature is not in objects such as this, but in the space
between them: the complex ecosystems; the communities and webs of
life; the interdependence that millions of years of evolution have
endowed this delicately balanced biosphere. And how all this so
amazes, awes, and humbles us. Science tends to be reductive, and so
struggles when asked to understand the connections between things,
rather than the things themselves.
In
viewing this photo again, I can see that perhaps it was the dark
monochrome background that brought this to mind: what a simplifying
image of the natural world, as if these insects could exist as
solitary creatures, in isolation from their environment.
The
same applies to us, as well. We are not the “self-made men” of
libertarian ideology. Rather, we evolved as social animals and exist
in society. Without others, we not only fail to thrive, we die. And
working in the other direction, we are also multiple: a walking
ecosystem of our own, part of a community that includes all the
microbes our bodies contain and carry. There are billions of these,
living in our guts and on our skin; and who – unbelievably –
number more cells than our own. It also appears that they influence
us, gut microbes sending signals up the vagus nerve to the brain,
perhaps influencing things like mood, satiety, and our immune
systems. So not only are we not solitary, we also may not be the
autonomous creatures we appear: neither our consciousness nor agency
are as absolute as we have always flattered ourselves.
Anyway,
the analogy that immediately came to me was music. Because I find its
greatest power in the space between the notes: the space for
imagination and anticipation, the self-restraint that makes less
more. The music I prefer is slow, spare, and under-produced.
Minimalist. It does not inundate with sound. It requires a certain
engagement and investment on the part of the listener.
The
great jazz vocalists are especially good at this. I think of Billy
Holiday, whose laconic style sounds effortless, and whose power you
are sure of, but is held back. You listen just waiting for her to let
go, and in the meantime are mesmerized by the authenticity and
suffering she conveys.
I
think the strength of good poetry is similar. Because in poetry, less
is almost always more. And ideally, a reader will have her own
imagery, meaning, and memory triggered by the words, filling in and
expanding out. And because poetry is improved by self-restraint:
when the author is comfortable with ambiguity, trusts the reader to
do some of the work. The less said, the better. I sometimes think
every poem aspires to be a Haiku, distilled down to its essence.
So
this poem began by writing about the space between the notes. I never
got to the Praying Mantis. I never got to the part about the beauty
of nature that is not in its beautiful creatures and plants, but in
the space between them, the living matrix in which they exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment