Missing Eve
May 25 2026
I am not an artist.
I work in words
not colour, shape, and line.
At best, I'm still a toddler
drawing stick-men
with pencil arms and pneumatic heads
beneath a smiling sun;
the unspoiled world
of an innocent child.
But while I find it all hard
I’ve been told the hardest by far
is the human hand.
You’d think 5 digits and a palm
would be simple enough,
even for dabblers
in the visual arts.
Would it be bold to see this as telling
. . . even as metaphor?
Because the hand
is no mere extremity
but how we encounter the world.
How we reach out and touch,
clasp and hold,
make passionate love.
How even in darkness, we feel our way,
and how the blind go eyeless
the lost are led.
How a newborn on her mother’s chest
grasps reflexively,
snuggling into her warmth
and feeling her hand
envelope him there.
How we give a hand, and lend one.
How hand-to-hand and hand-to-heart
we solemnly declare.
And how we reach down,
proffering a hand-up
to those in need.
Even the space we give
to this small body part
is telling,
the homunculus’ huge hands
— the hunchbacked ogre
that is the brain’s funhouse mirror
version of us.
Its fingers and thumb
like the real ones
bristling with nerves
and pulsing with sensation;
humongous tongue
busting out of its mouth;
and ample manhood
that’s basic anatomy
but still seems pornographic.
I think of the ceiling
of the Sistine chapel,
and of Michelangelo
on his back
on a hard wooden scaffold
painting his masterpiece;
the hand of God
reaching languidly out
to an unsuspecting Adam,
leaning back
in all his manly splendour.
So the Creation of Man
begins with touch.
The first man
brought to life
and sent out into the world,
granted free will
and on his own.
In God’s image, but ungodly.
An innocent feeling his way
in an unspoiled Eden
as an innocent sun shines cheerfully down.
And how all alone, his one great desire
is for someone to touch
and, in turn
be touched by.
I
originally called this Missing Eve. Which I still feel
ambivalent about. I think it would have provided a satisfying sense
of closure in to the poem. But it also anticipates I'm the
unexpected turn the poem takes, which I suspect might have given too
much away.
In the meantime, “desire” is a powerful word. So the title I went with does the basic work of a good title: it entices the reader in.
Below is a representation of the human homunculus, demonstrating the highly enervated tongue and hands, which take up such a disproportionate amount of space in the brain's cortex:
I dislike ending a line with a preposition (or pronoun, for that matter), let alone an entire poem! Not because there’s any grammatical prohibition, but because it’s a weak word in a privileged place. Yet I think by works here. First, it resonates with desire, so kind of cinches the ending shut, the way a rhyming couplet does. Second, it’s open-ended, seeming to trail off unfinished, and so invites the reader to complete the implied question: by whom?
If you doubted my lack of artistic ability, perhaps this will convince you. My masterpiece:
.jpeg)
.png)

No comments:
Post a Comment