Snapshot
Nov 14 2021
There aren't many family photos.
When there wasn't a camera in every pocket.
When pictures were actual objects,
one-of-a-kind
and not easily shared.
And when people were more private
and perhaps more modest, as well,
so we never saw the point
of documenting our lives
as exhaustively as now.
But there we all are
in shades of black and white,
in a battered cookie tin
of brittle strips of negatives
and uncatalogued prints;
faces that will remain anonymous
because those who would know
are now gone for good.
The more recent ones are Kodachrome.
But to me, these lack the gravitas
of black and white,
because those old photos seem eternal
archetypal
larger than life,
while colour is disposable
as mundane as everyday.
The pictures are beginning to fade;
which is disappointing
but only to be expected.
Because nothing is forever
not even us.
There we all are, that is
except for my father.
Who, as the privileged male, the head of the house
naturally took charge,
delegating himself
family photographer.
So, in a sense, he appears in every shot,
invisible
but present nevertheless.
Because we're seeing through his eyes.
Because we can't help but sense him there
the object of our gaze.
Because we remember how he fretted,
urging us to smile
squeeze-in closer,
to keep our eyes open
and look candid, not posed.
As if he hasn't gone anywhere
and is still fussily adjusting the lens
fiddling with light,
positioning us
to get the background just right.
So while the man behind the camera
is never caught
he's also never absent.
His shadow
in every snapshot he took.
And in some
a blurry thumb
obscuring the lens
as he fumbled for perfection.
Because he may have taken charge,
but was never very adept
or good with technology.
An abiding ineptitude
I can't help but find charming.
Which is why, for me
it's these flawed but earnest pictures
that truly capture him.
The perfect candid moment.
The ones I love the most.
There really are hardly any pictures of my family growing up. This may be hard to understand for young people today, when technology makes it easy, social media make it almost obligatory, and there is a culture that is much more narcissistic than modest.
If anything, it was actually my mother who took pictures. She was the one who often had her finger on the lens. But I think the stereotypical fumbling dad (the sitcom dad?) works better in the poem. And the technical ineptitude was very much him. Yes, charming in its way. But also frustrating to see him puzzle over stuff that, to me, was obvious!
Yet while both my parents are kind of present in this poem, it did not start out with any autobiographical intent. Rather, the idea came from this line, which appeared near the end of article by Caitlin Flanagan in today's Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/11/caitlin-flanagan-aging-60/620679/):
In this light, that old snapshot looks different. There’s my big sister standing next to me, casting a worried, watchful eye over me as she has for 60 years; there’s a little bit of my mother—my mother! It’s been so long since I’ve heard her voice—and there’s my father, present in his absence, recording the moment with his camera.
Present in his absence. I was struck by that phrase and that idea. Reading it I could immediately see the dutiful father, proudly recording his family while feeling that his own presence was immaterial. And how, more generally, the one behind the camera may be invisible, but somehow can't help but be in every picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment