Snapshot
Nov
14 2021
There
aren't many family photos.
When
there wasn't a camera in every pocket.
When
pictures were actual objects,
one-of-a-kind
and
not easily shared.
And
when people were more private
and
perhaps more modest, as well,
so
we never saw the point
of
documenting our lives
as
exhaustively as now.
But
there we all are
in
shades of black and white,
in
a battered cookie tin
of
brittle strips of negatives
and
uncatalogued prints;
faces
that will remain anonymous
because
those who would know
are
now gone for good.
The
more recent ones are Kodachrome.
But
to me, these lack the gravitas
of
black and white,
because
those old photos seem eternal
archetypal
larger
than life,
while
colour is disposable
as
mundane as everyday.
The
pictures are beginning to fade;
which
is disappointing
but
only to be expected.
Because
nothing is forever
not
even us.
There
we all are, that is
except
for my father.
Who,
as the privileged male, the head of the house
naturally
took charge,
delegating
himself
family
photographer.
So,
in a sense, he appears in every shot,
invisible
but
present nevertheless.
Because
we're seeing through his eyes.
Because
we can't help but sense him there
the
object of our gaze.
Because
we remember how he fretted,
urging
us to smile
squeeze-in
closer,
to keep our eyes open
and
look candid, not posed.
As
if he hasn't gone anywhere
and
is still fussily adjusting the lens
fiddling
with light,
positioning
us
to
get the background just right.
So
while the man behind the camera
is
never caught
he's
also never absent.
His
shadow
in
every snapshot he took.
And
in some
a
blurry thumb
obscuring
the lens
as
he fumbled for perfection.
Because
he may have taken charge,
but
was never very adept
or
good with technology.
An
abiding ineptitude
I
can't help but find charming.
Which
is why, for me
it's
these flawed but earnest pictures
that
truly capture him.
The
perfect candid moment.
The
ones I love the most.
There really are hardly any pictures of
my family growing up. This may be hard to understand for young people
today, when technology makes it easy, social media make it almost
obligatory, and there is a culture that is much more narcissistic
than modest.
If anything, it was actually my mother
who took pictures. She was the one who often had her finger on the
lens. But I think the stereotypical fumbling dad (the sitcom dad?)
works better in the poem. And the technical ineptitude was very much
him. Yes, charming in its way. But also frustrating to see him puzzle
over stuff that, to me, was obvious!
Yet while both my parents are kind of
present in this poem, it did not start out with any autobiographical
intent. Rather, the idea came from this line, which appeared near the
end of article by Caitlin Flanagan in today's Atlantic
(https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/11/caitlin-flanagan-aging-60/620679/):
In
this light, that old snapshot looks different. There’s my big
sister standing next to me, casting a worried, watchful eye over me
as she has for 60 years; there’s a little bit of my mother—my
mother! It’s been so long since I’ve heard her voice—and
there’s my father, present in his absence, recording the moment
with his camera.
Present
in his absence.
I was struck by that phrase and that idea. Reading it I could
immediately see the dutiful father, proudly recording his family
while feeling that his own presence was immaterial. And how, more
generally, the one behind the camera may be invisible, but somehow
can't help but be in every picture.