Never Again
Nov 7 2024
When he said the end of history
I doubt he meant rewriting the past.
That is, the end of history
as we know it
— as if what we all took for granted
didn’t happen after all.
Or meant that history would end
by forgetting it entirely
— the memory hole
of Orwell’s imagining.
Rather, I think he envisioned the end
as a sunlit upland
of equality
prosperity
and enlightenment.
As a consensus
on how to govern ourselves
and what we value in life.
That at the end of history
we’d finally be done
with all the sturm und drang
and existential angst.
But the lessons of recent history
as well as the deeper past
leave me wondering
if we’ve actually progressed,
even if it’s just 2 steps ahead
while falling back 1.
So that the history
of civilized man
resembles a saw-edged graph
that keeps sloping ever upward
— somewhat erratic, but progress of a sort.
The way a drunk staggers out
after last call
but eventually makes it home.
Or instead of a line
trending steadily upward
as an arrow aims higher,
does history move in cycles?
A closed circle,
repeating over and over
the mistakes we failed to learn.
Or perhaps a pendulum
tick-tocking back and forth;
reacting,
over-correcting,
then changing direction again.
Because while we flatter ourselves
that we’ve become wiser
better informed
and more moral than before,
we’re still the same human beings
our forbears were;
no less hypocritical
cynical
or ill-informed,
with the same basic instincts
intrinsic flaws.
And neither are we that far removed
from our primate progenitors,
with whom
as with the chimpanzees and apes
so much DNA is shared;
competing for status and mates,
defending turf,
deferring
to the chest-beating egoists.
So now, in a 21st century
that threatens to reprise the 20th
as if no lessons were learned,
it would seem the end of history
is one of both:
rewriting, as well as forgetting.
Of self-serving leaders
who selectively edit the past,
while young people
know little of this century
let alone the last;
of its wars, fascism, genocides
and strong-man rule.
That’s “genocides”, plural:
we may have vowed never again
but somehow still did.
Or will the end of history
be none of these?
Instead, might it end altogether,
in whatever man-made calamity
we sleepwalk into?
Perhaps a nuclear exchange
or climate change,
a pandemic
as deadly as the last
but managed even worse.
And all because
we never learned
and failed to take care.
Counting down the days
until no one remembers
because no one’s even left.
Another poem inspired by Trump. This time post-election.
The original title was "Francis Fukuyama", after the academic who became famous for coining the phrase the end of history. What I understand he meant was a consensus about steady progress toward a more equal world of democracy, globalism, and the liberal international order. (Although if he also had in mind capitalism -- that is, our current consumerist growth dependent sort of capitalism -- then I would take issue. Consumerism and perpetual growth are unsustainable. A market economy -- if it's unregulated, unenlightened, and libertarian -- is unsustainable. And not just in the long run!)
A man who is not only largely ignorant the past (as well as much else!) and twists what he does know, but is actually shameless enough to brazenly rewrite the present! His ability to lie and distort are pathological. Maybe even to the extent of fooling himself into truly believing. Although I see in Trump far more self-serving cynicism than delusion. Not to mention, as the poem says, the archetype of the chest-beating egoist.
And an electorate that either isn’t paying attention (people, after all, lead busy difficult lives, and have neither the time nor the energy to keep up with the news), or doesn’t known enough about the past to be scared (the failure of our schools to teach history and civics, let alone media literacy and critical thinking skills). Or worse, doesn’t care.
So while we are happily distracting ourselves, political discourse is coarsened, democracy under threat, the international order destabilized, and authoritarians everywhere encouraged. Out of ignorance, we risk letting ourselves slip back into the 1930s: a repeat of fascism, protectionist trade wars, and lost prosperity.
Which would be consistent with a cyclic view of history. Except that now, the existential threats of nuclear weapons and climate change loom. The end of history for real.
I find that this sort of poem is more suited to prose. So these are the hardest to get right. Saying not too much and not too little, while getting it to land just so on the tongue and ear. It can be a push/pull between prosody and content.
No comments:
Post a Comment