Fathering
June 20 2021
It's Father's Day.
I'm tempted to sneer
at this manufactured holiday
ginned-up for commerce.
Its slick sentimentality
cajoling us to buy.
Its embrace of the bumbling but well-meaning Dad,
who is white, and middle class
and bad at diapering.
Or is even that an accident,
and today was intended to compensate
the marginalized old man
for May's extravaganza
of motherhood.
I am not a dad.
To judge by my brothers
I might have made a good one,
but knowing myself
I wonder.
An uncomfortable truth
that the word itself reveals.
Because “fathering”
is very different than “to mother”,
paternity
not at all the same as nurturing.
Although the more I learn
about the absent father
the more I value his role.
The importance of presence,
even if he hugs kind of stiffly
and finds "love" hard to say.
Still, can anyone really know
what kind of parent they'll make?
So I regret
I never had the chance to be tested.
How sad
we realize what we've missed
only when it's too late.
Because fathers deserve their day,
even if it was dreamed up
to hustle sensible hats
and after-shave.
Seeing his big meaty hands
awkwardly cradling
a helpless baby
makes even a cynic soften;
her wide eyes
looking directly up at his,
her crying stilled.
He will learn to diaper
He will stay
and watch her grow.
He will get a corny card
and gaudy tie
and long heartfelt embrace.
Put the card safely away
and save it for posterity.
When I ultimately googled the origins of Father's Day, it turns out that it's not some mercenary holiday concocted by marketers and card companies in the interest of venal commerce. It began honourably, perhaps dating back to 1908 when the daughter of a Civil War veteran lobbied local churches to honour fatherhood on her own dad's birthday. Although the origins appear to be murkier than that simple story, since I read both Spokane and West Virginia, and 1908 as well as 1910. It became official by means of a Presidential decree, and again, I found 2 versions: one, attributing this to Woodrow Wilson, the other Richard Nixon. But whatever story is accurate, I doubt the day would continue to be so widely observed and so culturally obligatory were it not for those same merchandisers and card companies flogging their wares.
I think this poem is a little more confessional and sentimental than usual. Not that there isn't a good measure of cynicism at its beginning. And I should say that the image of those manly hands cradling the helpless baby has become a kind of cliché of advertising, and pure manipulation. Still, whatever its origin, it's still an undeniably powerful image. As the poem implies, while your cool calculating intellectual mind can respond to it with cynicism, tear glands don't lie!
No comments:
Post a Comment