Dharma
May 22 2021
His
compact body,
scrambling
up, and falling back
the
smooth curve of the tub,
jet
black
on
glossy white enamel.
Hot
water
wide-open
tap,
a
slowly rising flood.
A
reverent Buddhist
could
never kill a bug.
He
scrutinizes the ground
before
venturing a step,
lets
flies
bite
freely.
But
I am not nearly so virtuous.
a
non-believer
who
eats meat and swats mosquitoes
ignores
the peril of worms.
Yet
I reached down,
and
with cupped finger-tips
gently
slid him up the slick vertical cliff
and
over the edge.
So
why could I not bear
to
let him swirl down the drain?
Eight
legs
paddling
madly as he cooked,
his
buoyant body
flushed
airily away?
Perhaps
because I despair
at
all the suffering in the world
but
feel powerless to change it.
Because
I mostly feel unseen
and
inefficacious.
All
around us, all the time
the
merciless churn
of
life and death goes on.
And
here, a small harmless spider,
as
disposable as breathing out
and
inconsequential.
Nevertheless,
from
a faithless man
a
simple effortless act.
As
if the hand of God
had
reached down from heaven,
and
with the merest gesture
could
revoke and dispense life.
A
Dharmic act
to
set the world right,
even
if only
infinitesimally small.
I
find that the older I get, the more exquisitely I feel the suffering
of others – human or not.
(Also,
unfortunately, the more misanthropic, pessimistic, and nihilistic.
Which may make me an ideal subject for the study of outlook on mental
and physical health. Although I suspect I already know the answer: sunny and optimistic would probably fare much better!)
I
read an article today that referred to a traditional Chinese dish
that involved boiling crabs alive.(https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/17/the-gatekeepers-who-get-to-decide-what-food-is-disgusting
) Which may tempt us to judge another culture and feel disgust. But
only if we forget that many of us give no second thought to eating
lobster that have been similarly boiled alive. While reading this, I
reflected back on how earlier today I had carefully redirected and
slowed the stream of hot water in the laundry tub to spare a small
spider who was on the verge of being washed away. I also refuse to
eat lobster. Not that I'm even close to the virtuous person any of
this might make me appear. But somehow, this small inconsequential
gesture left me feeling better about the world, as well as my very
modest place in it. Perhaps the path to virtue consists of many small
steps.
I
thought not only of dharma and the Buddhist reverence of all life,
but of the Jewish concept of tikun
olam, which has come to
mean one's duty to “repair the world”. But I prefer the Buddhist
worldview, because it does not privilege human life; it reveres all
life as if we are all sentient and equally deserving. This may
explain why I personified the spider: instead of “it”, I very
intentionally used “he”, “him”, and “who”. (“She”
and “her”would have worked just as well, but I guess I allowed
myself to be lazily led by the weight of literary tradition, in which
the male gender has customarily been the default.)
I
really like the hand of
God line. I think it's
the irony: a militant atheist, using religious references. But is
also literally true, because this simple act is equivalent in its
mercy and consequence as any notion of Godliness. Anyway, to have
power over life and death and not exercise it seems horribly
negligent and solipsistic.
I
generally prefer to avoid “big” words for two reasons. First,
they tend to evoke an intellectual rather than an emotional response
because they take that much more processing. In my poetry (prose is
different) I want language to enter the brain as close as possible to
the way music does: directly, with no processing or deconstruction.
And second, most people are unfamiliar with “big” words, so their
use can be counted on to interrupt the flow, perhaps even turn a
reader away from the poem. No one likes a show-off! Nevertheless, I
couldn't resist “efficacious”. The rhyme was too perfect, so when
it struck me I couldn't drop it. Even though I probably should have
for another reason, as well: it's redundant, since I already
referred to powerlessness. . . .Perhaps, though, redundancy is
sometimes OK: if something is important to say, it can benefit from
the emphasis.