Posterity
March 2 2021
My mother saved everything, it seems.
I realized this
when I received a big shopping bag
brimming with ephemera
when the condo was cleaned out.
Old newspaper clippings
on brittle yellowed paper.
Unlabelled Kodachromes
and letters home from camp,
birth announcements
and mother's day cards
and kindergarten art.
We are not a family
who express affection easily.
So it's understandable
that a mother
who could be distant and stubborn
kept her motherly love to herself.
Or might her pack-rat tendencies
more simply explain
this archive of her son?
Trained as a librarian
I would have expected indices
and time-lines
and neatly labelled folders.
But it was all mixed up,
as if year after year
it had been squirrelled away
for posterity to sort out.
I am not a sentimental man.
So I have culled a few pieces
and plan to discard the rest.
Which feels disloyal, I admit;
to my mother's urge to protect
and to remembrance of my past.
But I'm a practical man
and know they're of no use,
while pretty
even sure she herself
never riffled through the bag,
losing track of time
in happy reminiscence.
So this is how I imagine it.
It's the having, not the thing itself.
The talismanic power
of possession
is where the meaning lies.
As if simply to keep, keeps the past alive.
As if clinging to the evidence
validates a life.
But my style is minimalist,
all spare décor
and clean unornamented lines.
So stuff
left to moulder away
in a closet's dark stale air
is just collecting dust.
I prefer to let memory do the work
keep my eyes on what's to come.
And
as to posterity,
I imagine some future archaeologist
sifting through a long abandoned landfill,
disinterring the past
from under mountains of soil.
Where a shopping bag of ephemera
will be found,
deprived of oxygen and sun
and perfectly preserved;
saved
not by my efforts to conserve
but my negligence.
Where he will jigsaw together
the scattered pieces of a life
to solve the puzzle of a lost world.
As if, as odd and eccentric as I am
I'd been an everyman
and not simply myself.
This story is true. And not just a clipping of a birth announcement, but 2 entire broadsheet newspapers that contain it! My mother is far from a hoarder. But she is a child of the Depression, and so has an aversion to waste as well as pack-rat tendencies: old pieces of string, odd buttons, broken shoelaces, and bits of aluminum foil that are “perfectly good”. And because she can't resist a bargain – getting a deal – she accumulates a lot of junkie stuff. The logic of “you can't afford the saving” never landed with her! (And, anyway, she could mostly afford it. . . . The past tense here because her shopping days are pretty much behind her now.)
I do feel disloyal, discarding this stuff so lovingly preserved for so many years. But I am not sentimental enough and too practical to want it collecting dust. Nor do I want it to burden whoever has to clean up after me when it's my turn to go. After all, it will all be discarded then, no matter what. My worldview tends toward nihilism. I see myself as an insignificant speck in a vast indifferent universe. I value personal humility over self-importance. So it's easy for me to not feel much attachment to all this ephemera. In fact, I'm almost embarrassed by the message of self-regard it sends.
I recall reading that one of the best preserved items in landfills was old phone books. And that they can be treasure troves of information for archaeologists of the recent past. Of course, there are no phone books anymore. But these thick compendiums of closely pressed pages, kept from oxygen, resist decomposition. They can emerge after decades underground looking almost pristine. So the thought occurs to me that discarding this stuff may, ironically, present its best chance at survival. And if so, will future archaeologists imagine this picture of my life – incomplete as it is – as typical of my era? What a terrible mistake that would be!
No comments:
Post a Comment