Minimalist Art
I paddle my canoe
with easy practiced strokes.
It is red, of course.
All canoes are red,
even the blues and the greens
underneath
their trendy paint.
Canoes, which come and go;
but the same paddle
for over 40 years.
It's richly burnished cherry.
A hard wood,
strong enough to be made
with lightness, and grace.
It has a long tapered blade
thin neck
finely shaped grip,
that fits my hand
like something warm, organic.
It could very well be hung
as a work of art.
Because the true test of sculpture
is that you want to see it from every side,
circling, and circling again.
And that you can't resist touch,
warm wood
with its fine-grained gloss.
But its beauty
is not so much aesthetic
as utilitarian.
An engineer would admire its efficiency,
material pared down
to bare necessity.
And how perfectly
it suits its task.
Because there is no improving
on a canoe paddle.
Nor the canoe,
another triumph
of minimalist art.
I cut through still water
in a setting sun.
Its liquid surface
mirrors the sky's red glow,
my reflection
paddling in tandem
stroke-for-stroke.
The blade seamlessly enters.
Small vortices
spin-off in its wake.
And then the return,
skimming the surface in a perfect arc
trailing tiny silent drops.
In no direction, and to no particular end;
muscle memory
that seems effortless,
tracking true, and straight.
I paddle my canoe,
an old paddle, and an older man
in the cool dusk.
A secluded lake
that still retains
summer's fading heat.
I have a beautiful cherry-wood
paddle. It's a Grassmere paddle, and I had it made (custom ordered at what I
then thought was exorbitant cost!) at the end of my last season working as a
very poorly paid counsellor at summer camp (Pine Crest, out of the Toronto
YMCA). It was a traditional camp: boys only, general interest outdoorsy stuff,
and centred on canoe-tripping. I don't think camps like this exist anymore. Now
they're all (quite sensibly!) co-ed. Now they're all about computers, or
hockey, or music.
Actually, it's displayed more as a
work of art than a functional piece of equipment. We would have called this a
"style" paddle: no good for canoe-tripping; more for show. But even
if it isn't used as the poem suggests, it's used in other ways. It connects me
to this long ago past ...to a very significant stage of life ...and to a time
of passage to the next. I'm not sentimental. I'm not much interested in
"stuff" in general. And I have very few artifacts of my past. But
this is something I'm very pleased to possess.
I thought of a paean to the canoe paddle
while reading a review of Roy MacGregor's new book Canoe Country: The Making
of Canada. I've written about canoes before; but never the paddle. Yet
every time I look at this one, I think of its exquisite combination of
aesthetic beauty, function, and minimalism; how it so perfectly ...suits its
task. What could be more deserving of a poem? (I also wanted to include
something of my snarling contempt for those who, with the blissful ignorance of
the dilettante, call them "oars", not paddles. But manfully
resisted!)
I think the ending could be read
metaphorically. As it progresses from old paddle to older man,
then calls back to the heat of summer, it seems to say that not only has
paddling called up the narrator's long-ago youth, the summer of life, but that
it actually restores him to that youth: he is the lake, and the heat of summer
is in him once again.
I added the 2nd stanza in a last
read-through I thought was just a formality that would confirm the poem was
done. The original was this: I paddle my canoe/ with easy practiced strokes/
with a paddle I've owned/ for over 40 years. The repetition of with
struck me as a little off. (Now, as I re-visist, it seems to work extremely
well! And there's no doubt that the original version gets right into the meat
of the poem with an elegant economy of words.) Nevertheless, now that I've
written it, I can't bear to lose the line All canoes are red; even if it
is an unnecessary digression. In fact, it may be my favourite line! I
know italics are highly problematic: attentive readers resent being led by the
nose; and if the context itself doesn't call up the emphasis, then it probably
means I've failed to write well. But because all is so essential to the
idea, and even though of course probably adds enough weight, I let it
stand. (I don't at all mind using italics to indicate dialogue. I think
quotations marks look clunky. And I think italics alters the reader's voice in
a way that works better than quotes.)
No comments:
Post a Comment