The
Things We’ve Lost in the Snow
March 14 2014
The
things we’ve lost in the snow.
The
spare glasses, from your back pocket,
now
vacantly watching
in
absolute dark.
I
know how careful you are,
how
the scratched lens
would
upset you.
How
essential they are
to
your view of the world,
sharply
etched
and
unequivocal.
The
keys I dropped
on
my way to the car
fingers
stiff with cold.
When
all I want
is
to go as far as possible.
How
something dense, like that
will
vanish;
as
seamless as water
straight
to the bottom
all
the way down,
its
smooth white surface
undisturbed.
Like
her inscrutable face
turning
away,
eyes
empty
mouth
set.
All
the dog turds, freeze-drying.
The
orphaned mitt,
I
gave up trying
to
find.
The
footprints, that circled blindly
and
unaccountably stopped.
Until
the leveling wind,
another
blizzard
filled
them in.
Sanitized
just
as history does the past;
written
by
the winners
as
it usually is.
It
will all emerge in spring.
Like
a prisoner, from quarantine,
blinking
in
unaccustomed sun.
Footprints,
even;
because
packed snow
is
slow to thaw,
the
ghosts of where we walked
glistening
wetly.
Side-by-side
or
single-file
or
heading-off our separate ways.
Lost,
and found
and
lost again.
I've written this poem a few times before: the idea of tell-tale footprints in the snow; the way an object can vanish without a trace in snow, or water; this metaphor for separation and romantic disillusion. I just hope that each time I have a go at it, I improve. And, after all, you can't really plagiarize yourself!
Not that I intended to have another go at something. It was more the first line materializing, and feeling compelled to run with it. Perhaps the idea came from an article about Lydia Davis, whose writing is a cross between prose poetry and flash fiction: short stories that are as short as a paragraph, and combine the ambiguity, irresolution, and distilled language of poetry with the narrative drive of story-telling. And what could be more distilled and inscrutable than objects lost in the snow? And what could be more challenging than constructing a story by implication; that is, imagining the objects as points and drawing lines to connect them?
Here's an example of her writing:
If you were to look in on us, you would be amazed at the elegance in which we live. You would see us sweep into the driveway in a pale green station wagon, casually pat our thoroughbreds as we entered our restored, pre-revolutionary home with its thick beams and red tiled floors. . . . You would see us during the day with dreamy looks in our eyes writing poetry and little dibs and dabs of nothing, as though we had been born to idleness. Perhaps I would invite you to go sketching and we would take the folding chairs and our pads of sketch paper. Perhaps later we would listen to an opera from where we lounged beside the bright medieval fireplace, our
And actually, now that I think about, I realize exactly where this poem began. Here's more from the same article (from the
It is not only the act of writing that forces
...E-mail can be equally threatening. In the office,
What it became:
Personal Announcement
Woman named Shrubbs
Has lost faux tortoiseshell eyeglasses
Where?
Somewhere between nursery school
and sacred space
They are possibly
covered by snow.
I can't explain the radical change of voice in the 4th
stanza. It's all you, we, I; then suddenly, and in only
this line, it becomes "...Like her pale face ...". It just
sounds right. Perhaps it's the sense of distance, of alienation, this conveys.
Perhaps it's because this is more an interior thought, a rumination; as opposed
to the rest of the poem, which is more a one-sided conversation with this
hypothetical "you".
No comments:
Post a Comment