He Says It Like It Is
Feb 15 2025
If we all said what we meant
shared the thoughts we say in our heads,
talked freely
about religion and faith,
ethnicity and race,
forbidden love
or plain and simple lust,
would we gain trust
or lose it?
Would others open up
as if we’d given permission,
or shut their ears
and fleeting ?
Or should we say what they want hear?
Harmless gossip
and weather talk,
chitchat
about the innocuous day-to-day?
Yet they preach honesty
and tell me to speak up,
admire the forthright man
who is fearless
and says it like it is.
Trouble is
a con man sounds sincere
and even straight-shooters can be wrong.
Or right, who’s to say?
Is there only one truth, absolute and singular,
or is truth multiple
— your truth
half truths
the sworn truth,
what once seemed true
but no longer does;
proven truth
that was immutable
but later fails?
And if so
whose truth do I accept?
As for me, I’m prudent
keep my thoughts close to my chest.
Especially
the transgressive and offensive ones
that might make me a pariah
upset accepted norms.
(The impulsive ones
— when I see red, and all bets are off —
slip out
despite myself.)
The rest, I edit
before measuring out my words.
Even though they don’t always emerge
quite as I intended,
neither untruth or truth
just misunderstood.
So like most of us
I speak tactfully, and show respect,
saying what’s expected
supporting the consensus
keeping friends friends.
Trying to be popular
or at least fit in.
Which sounds better than cacophony,
scandal and shock,
broken social bonds.
Because while honesty is good
don’t they also say go along to get along,
that nothing is wrong
with a little discretion?
(The magisterial “they”,
the voice of authority
although no one knows from where.)
So I speak softly,
monitor every word,
know when to stop.
The voices in my head
I keep to myself.
Truth is under attack these days: liars and hypocrites in positions of power; jaw-dropping shamelessness; facts, cynically twisted or invented.
So when Trump supporters laud him for “saying it like it is”, steam comes out my ears. Because he just says what people want to hear, or makes stuff up to further his agenda. He even lies when there’s nothing to gain and no reason. He denies what he said, even when it’s on tape. Because he knows people forget, aren’t paying attention, or hear and see through prisms of ideology and tribal loyalty. Not to mention that “flooding the zone with shit” (à la Steve Bannon) makes it impossible to keep track.
But this poem isn’t political. It’s really about that inner dialogue we guardedly keep to ourselves; the forbidden thoughts we all have, but would never admit.
No comments:
Post a Comment