You occupy the high ground.
The commanding heights
from which armies rush,
standing in stirrups
in clouds of dust;
hooves, thundering.
UpOlympus , a lesser god,
Up
who toys with us, tests
our trust
sneering down
yet craves our love.
A deity, in our own image,
hurtling lightning bolts
seducing our women,
cursed
by jealousy, lust
by jealousy, lust
conviction.
The invincible view
that confirms your
omniscience.
And gravity
the castle moat
protecting you,
And gravity
the castle moat
protecting you,
your sheer fortress of
rock.
You are a grizzled old man
on the mountain top
just as we expected.
The long beard, the humble
rags
sitting
with
your legs crossed.
But you never possessed
the meaning of life
the answer to death,
the shibboleths
we question.
But you never possessed
the meaning of life
the answer to death,
the shibboleths
we question.
In the rarefied air
of altitude,
of altitude,
cold and wet
and short of breath
and no one left
but
you.
Too
weary to descend
to the valley
you barely recall,
lush, with rushing streams
and soft warm sun.
Where people stop
and idly talk
about the weather, their children
and nothing much,
catching-up with gossip.
to the valley
you barely recall,
lush, with rushing streams
and soft warm sun.
Where people stop
and idly talk
about the weather, their children
and nothing much,
catching-up with gossip.
Who rarely look up,
pay no mind to gods.
I suppose a poem about narcissism, self-aggrandizing delusion, the preoccupations of power, and the fallibility of ambition.
pay no mind to gods.
I suppose a poem about narcissism, self-aggrandizing delusion, the preoccupations of power, and the fallibility of ambition.
I say "suppose" because I let the poem take me by
the hand and guide me, blindfolded. Actually, most poem start like this.
Because setting down the first line is always an act of faith: in being
receptive; in suspending the self-criticism that fears failure or
embarrassment. And then, after the opening line, they continue that way: where
writing feels like channelling more than it does artfully composing something
fully my own.
This one began when I kept encountering this idea of
"the high ground": the place where generals want to be; where we
situate our gods; where we find our prized real estate with those grand exalted
views; and where we sit in self-righteous moral certainty. I think of the trope
of that classic New Yorker cartoon: with the wise old man sitting
serenely at the top of the mountain; and where the punch line is the cleverly
inevitable disappointment of the seeker, having painfully clawed his way up
seeking the meaning of life. Most directly, it was all the recent flooding that
had me thinking of the "commanding heights": the folly of building on
flood plains, and how well this illustrates our disconnection from nature,
where waterways disappear under concrete -- out of sight, out of mind. I
thought of my own unfortunate experience with flooding (4' in the basement!),
and how smug I feel now, occupying the high ground -- on top of a hill hundreds
of feet up.
I was most pleased when I came up with
"shibboleth". Because it fits perfectly in terms of rhythm and rhyme.
And because it's much more than simply a filler word: not only in its Biblical
resonance, which works nicely with the pagan god; but in its meaning, a code
word that allows you to cross a border -- in this case, the border into
enlightenment.
"Sheer"
is also a useful word, with the inherent tension of contradiction. Because it's
not only steep and absolute, but gossamer and vaporous. A poet must repeatedly
give thanks to English, in which words can mean almost their exact opposite!
I like "conviction" just as well. Not only because
it gave me the gift of a nice rhyme, which was actually closer to what I meant
to say (I originally had "vantage point" and "commanding
view", before it became "invincible view" and
"omniscience"); but because I think conviction is the root cause of
much that is wrong with the world: the absolute conviction that underpins religious
faith, moral certainty, ideological truth.
And while I'm getting my usual barb in at religion, I might
as well comment of the line "craves our love". Because I always
wonder about this omnipotent and imperious God who can also be so darn needy,
in such constant need of validation: that we worship Him, that we constantly
pay obeisance, that we have no other gods before Him. And who, when we fail to
pay sufficient attention, flies into a rage. Of course, I fully understand this
teaching if it's taken -- as it properly should -- as literary and allegorical:
where the "other gods" are things like pride or possessions. But
that's not the kind of religiosity I despise. It's the literalist,
fundamentalist, dogmatic version I find not only intellectually repugnant, but
dangerous.
Who wouldn't want to occupy the high ground? But sometimes, grandiose ideas and pretentious philosophy have less to offer than the simple pleasures; than the home truths and practical wisdom of everyday life. And as it turns out, compared to the top of the mountain, the lowly valley is a much more pleasant place to be! Which is why "pay no mind" works so well: so cogently dismissive; so confidently plain-spoken.
No comments:
Post a Comment